5G Consumer Law... Communication company Do not prove your lawsuit

A 5G consumer group lawsuit that led by the Legal Corporations owner was launched. In the first argument, the communications three of the communications said, This incident must be preceded by the congregation of the congregation (600 consumers).

The consumer lawyer was promoted by the carriers to the 5G advertisement, but the actual quality is the actual quality, and the consumers have suffered economic and mental loss. However, the communications side laws have been in charge of poisoning from the lawsuit before proceeding to the view.

On the 19th, the Central District Court of Seoul, 600 consumers were held for the first argument of damages that were filed against SK Telecom, KT, and LG U Plus. This lawsuit is a group lawsuit that the main side is a lawsuit against the 5G consumer litigation,

SK Telecom, KT, and LG U Plus appointed the lawyers of the domestic top-level law firms such as Classes, Pacific and Square, respectively.

Communications Three-sided laws have been conventional to ensure that they must be prestigious to ensure that they have a lawsuit proxy, and then need to be clearly clear if they have to prove to the debt fusion.

In this case, the court asked, I hope to be fulfilled, because there is a defendant in relation to the lawsuit.

The Legal Law member recruited the lawsuits through the character certification of the group litigation platform angry people, but it is a judgment that the manuscript is difficult to recognize the manuscript.

Communication company 5G Quality degradation Even if it is degraded,

In relation to the 5G quality of 5G quality of this case, telecom attorneys argued that the attorneys are not a scope of terms.

On the other hand, the consumer-side lawyer argued that there is a defense of debt and law. However, it is not particularly not specific to the areas of the law, but it is expected that the claims and provisions will be made on the next argument.

The LG U Plus side lawyer said, It is necessary to be a concrete basis for claiming the contents of the debt in the manuscript, he said.

The trial requested that the trial was 3 Company 5G plans to be different in the date of time and the date of subscription and the rates, and the shading area, and the residence position, and the loss of the loss.

Consumer side lawyers will be able to prove easily from the manufacturer, as if they were claimed by the manufacturer, if the defendant is not necessarily transmitted and received, I asked to order submitting.

But I will go to the contractor to the contractor to the manufacturer, I do not know if it is because of the request of the communicator, but it refuses to provide the connection information history. The telecommunications lawyer said, I hear it for the first time.

The trial did not accept this request immediately. The trial is that consumers can request a query 5G communication failure of the associated device to each manufacturer, respectively.

Consumer side lawyer said, This lawsuit is expected to take at least two years, he said, In the United States, there was a judgment that the FCC (federal communications committee) in the United States has had a decision to provide free consumers that raise 5G quality complaints, I think there is something that is not accepted for the reason, he said.

On March 18, the secondary variations scheduled for the secondary disclosure of March 18, the claims of concrete exploration and 5G access failure history, which were a major issue, will be expected to be expected.